Some large Texas counties have recently purchased paper-based devices, including Dallas, Tarrant, Bexar and Collin. Texas faces a similar problem: As POLITICO reported last year, dozens of small counties there lack the resources or willingness to replace their insecure machines, and the state Legislature recently punted on mandating paper-based systems until at least 2021. In some cases, local officials have simply refused to acknowledge their voting machines are vulnerable. But many smaller counties still didn’t have enough money or time to replace their paperless equipment before the presidential primary, even though Congress gave states $380 million in federal election security grants in 2018. Several other large Tennessee counties, including Davidson and Williamson, recently purchased paper-based voting machines. ![]() In September, a federal judge dismissed the case, ruling that residents failed to show evidence of harm. Those concerns prompted voters to sue in 2018 to have the equipment replaced. Many counties there still use machines that do not produce individual paper vote records, which cybersecurity experts consider an essential protection against hacking and malfunctions.įor instance, voters in Shelby, Tenn., the state’s largest and most populous county and home to Memphis, will use a touchscreen model called the Dominion AccuVote TSx that experts say has serious security flaws. Tennessee and Texas represent the biggest election security concerns on Tuesday. ![]() Here’s a look at how the 14 Super Tuesday states compare: At risk Other states holding primaries on Tuesday, including Massachusetts, Maine and Vermont, predominantly use the technology that most experts consider the most secure: paper ballots that voters fill out by hand.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |